As a believer, I’d ask this genuinely: what kind of evidence would actually move you? Because if the answer is only something like a public miracle or direct appearance, then even that can be explained away as coincidence, hallucination, or unknown science. At that point, it’s not just about evidence—it’s about what standard you’re willing to accept.
From a faith perspective, God isn’t just an object to be tested but a reality encountered—through reason, morality, and personal experience. So the real question becomes: is there any form of evidence you wouldn’t reinterpret, or is the bar set in a way that makes belief impossible no matter what?
Something stronger than “look at nature” or “we don’t understand this, so God.” I’d need clear, testable, and repeatable evidence that points specifically to an intelligent source—something that can’t be explained by chance, bias, or current science, and holds up under scrutiny.
It can’t be an obvious logical fallacy—that alone eliminates most of the “evidence” people usually present.
It has to point to your God specifically, not just “some higher power” (otherwise I might as well believe in the Flying Spaghetti Monster).
It needs the same level of strong, credible evidence you’d demand for any extraordinary claim—like aliens engineering humans—not something vague or unfalsifiable.
